Understanding materiality can unlock accountability
With changes under way in the sustainability reporting landscape, clarity on what the scope of the various initiatives are, as determined by their approach to materiality, is key for organisations to understand their reporting obligations.
The latest issue of The GRI Perspective – The materiality madness: why definitions matter – demystifies the recent explosion in terminology and explains the approaches of the GRI Standards (impact materiality), the IFRS’ International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) (financial materiality), and the incoming European Sustainability Reporting Standards (double materiality) – and how they interconnect.
The paper sets out that, to meet the expectations of stakeholders, companies have to disclose sustainability information that relates to both financial value creation and their impacts on the environment and society. Taken together, these two approaches form the basis for double materiality.
Eelco van der Enden, CEO of GRI, said:
“It stands to reason that investor-focused sustainability reporting through the financial materiality lens alone will not allow for companies to be held accountable for their impacts on the environment and people. To suggest otherwise sows confusion and underlines why we need to be clear about the differences and synergies between the various initiatives; in particular, the approaches to materiality and the audiences they serve.
At GRI, we view the ISSB’s sustainability-related disclosure plans and Europe’s incoming Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive as complementary rather than competing. Alongside GRI’s widely-adopted standards for sustainability impacts, there are strong opportunities for alignment between all three.
We believe it is in the interests of all stakeholders to move to a two-pillar corporate reporting structure, with financial and sustainability reporting on an equal footing. The basis of this overarching system has to be double materiality. That is the only way to achieve the comparable and effective reporting needed to drive corporate accountability.”
The GRI Perspective is a regular series, launched in January 2022, which dives under the surface of topical themes in the world of sustainability reporting.
78% of the world’s 250 largest companies report in accordance with the GRI Standards
SustainCase was primarily created to demonstrate, through case studies, the importance of dealing with a company’s most important impacts in a structured way, with use of the GRI Standards. To show how today’s best-run companies are achieving economic, social and environmental success – and how you can too.
Research by well-recognised institutions is clearly proving that responsible companies can look to the future with optimism.
7 GRI sustainability disclosures get you started
Any size business can start taking sustainability action
GRI, IEMA, CPD Certified Sustainability courses (2-5 days): Live Online or Classroom (venue: London School of Economics)
- Exclusive FBRH template to begin reporting from day one
- Identify your most important impacts on the Environment, Economy and People
- Formulate in group exercises your plan for action. Begin taking solid, focused, all-round sustainability action ASAP.
- Benchmarking methodology to set you on a path of continuous improvement
References:
This article is based on published information by GRI. For the sake of readability, we did not use brackets or ellipses. However, we made sure that the extra or missing words did not change the publication’s meaning. If you would like to quote these written sources from the original please revert to the following link: