The case for CSR/ Sustainability Reporting Done Responsibly


IDENTIFY - MEASURE - MANAGE - CHANGE

Insights on how you can protect the environment, maintain and increase the value of your company, through a structured process.

Insights on how you can protect the environment, maintain and increase the value of your company, through a structured process.

Home / case studies / Case study: How ASE reduces the amount of waste it produces

Case study: How ASE reduces the amount of waste it produces

As a leading global provider of semiconductor manufacturing services, seeking to meet the electronics industry’s ever-growing needs for faster, smaller and higher performance chips, developing and offering a wide portfolio of services and solutions, ASE tries to constantly reduce the environmental impact of its operations through various pollution prevention measures and mechanisms.  Tweet This!

This case study is based on the 2016 Corporate Sustainability Report by ASE published on the Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Disclosure Database that can be found at this link. Through all case studies we aim to demonstrate what CSR/ ESG/ sustainability reporting done responsibly means. Essentially, it means: a) identifying a company’s most important impacts on the environment, economy and society, and b) measuring, managing and changing.

Layout 1

Abstract

ASE implements ISO 14001 Environmental Management in all of its facilities, to minimise environmental impacts and ensure effective waste management. In order to reduce the amount of waste it produces ASE took action to:

  • adopt an eco-design approach and promote waste recycling
  • collaborate to treat special waste liquids and recycle
  • use green packaging materials

What are the material issues the company has identified?

In its 2016 Corporate Sustainability Report ASE identified a range of material issues, such as regulatory compliance, employee health and safety, labour/management relations, training and talent development. Among these, reducing the amount of waste it produces stands out as a key material issue for ASE.

Stakeholder engagement in accordance with the GRI Standards

The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) defines the Principle of Stakeholder Inclusiveness when identifying material issues (or a company’s most important impacts) as follows:

“The reporting organization shall identify its stakeholders, and explain how it has responded to their reasonable expectations and interests.”

Stakeholders must be consulted in the process of identifying a company’s most important impacts and their reasonable expectations and interests must be taken into account. This is an important cornerstone for CSR / sustainability reporting done responsibly.

Key stakeholder groups ASE engages with:

Stakeholder Group                Method of engagement
Customers ·      Customer quarterly business review meeting

·      Customer audits

·      Technical forums

·      Customer service platform

Employees

 

·      GM mailbox

·      Intranet website

·      Satisfaction survey on employees

·      Dedicated employee helpline

Shareholders

 

·      Annual financial reports

·      Quarterly earnings release

·      Annual shareholder meeting

·      Institutional investors’ conference

Suppliers ·      Supplier questionnaire survey

·      Supplier on-site audits

·      Annual supplier forum

·      Supplier capacity-building activities

Government ·      Communication meetings, conferences, forums or seminars held by government authorities

·      Proactive dialogue with government authorities

·      Reporting through government portal

Community ·      ASE Charity Foundation

·      ASE Cultural and Educational Foundation

·      Employee volunteer activities

·      Community perception surveys and needs assessments

Industry Unions and Associations ·      Organisational member conference

·      Technology forums held by industry unions/associations

Media ·      Press releases

·      Spokesperson interviews

·      Company’s website

NGOs ·      Communication meetings, forums, seminars or workshops held by NGOs

·      Company’s website

·      Volunteer activity cooperation with NGOs

How stakeholder engagement was made to identify material issues

To identify and prioritise material topics based on stakeholders’ concerns, ASE carried out a survey. In total, 866 questionnaires were completed by stakeholders.

What actions were taken by ASE to reduce the amount of waste it produces?

In its 2016 Corporate Sustainability Report ASE reports that it took the following actions for reducing the amount of waste it produces:

  • Adopting an eco-design approach and promoting waste recycling
  • To reduce the amount of waste it produces, ASE adopted an eco-design approach. For example, ASE’s lightweight IC design reduces the amount of plastic waste. In addition, ASE continues to reduce pollution and promotes waste recycling to reduce the volume of sludge by enhancing sludge dehydration efficiency and activation rate, reducing and improving process source, recycling waste liquids from electro-plating machines, and discouraging the use of disposable cutlery.
  • Collaborating to treat special waste liquids and recycle
  • ASE collaborates with well-known universities to research and develop technologies for treating special waste liquids, such as high concentration of waste liquids containing boron, hydrogen peroxide and high COD. Additionally, in 2016, ASE Kaohsiung and Chungli worked with customers to recycle more than 0.24 million wafer boxes. ASE also cooperates with chemical agent suppliers to recycle and extend the service life of empty barrels, for re-fill and reuse. Accordingly, in 2016, ASE Kaohsiung and Chungli recycled more than 10 thousand empty barrels.
  • Using green packaging materials
  • ASE uses packaging materials that are made from recyclable materials. In 2016, ASE recycled 3,432 metric tons of packaging boxes, 1,001 metric tons of pallets, 710 metric tons of wafer boxes and 890 metric tons of other packaging materials. In addition, ASE reduced the consumption of natural resources by sorting and recycling packaging materials.

Which GRI Standards and corresponding Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have been addressed?

The GRI Standard addressed in this case is:

Disclosure 306-2 Waste by type and disposal method

 Disclosure 306-2 Waste by type and disposal method corresponds to:

 

80% of the world’s 250 largest companies report in accordance with the GRI Standards

SustainCase was primarily created to demonstrate, through case studies, the importance of dealing with a company’s most important impacts in a structured way, with use of the GRI Standards. To show how today’s best-run companies are achieving economic, social and environmental success – and how you can too.

Research by well-recognised institutions is clearly proving that responsible companies can look to the future with optimism.



FBRH GRI Standards Certified and IEMA approved Sustainability Course | Venue: London LSE

By registering for the next 2-day FBRH GRI-Standards Certified and IEMA approved Course you will be taking the first step in gaining the many benefits of sustainability reporting.

 

References:

1) This case study is based on published information by ASE, located at the link below. For the sake of readability, we did not use brackets or ellipses. However, we made sure that the extra or missing words did not change the report’s meaning. If you would like to quote these written sources from the original, please revert to the original on the Global Reporting Initiative’s Sustainability Disclosure Database at the link:

http://database.globalreporting.org/

2) http://www.fbrh.co.uk/en/global-reporting-initiative-gri-g4-guidelines-download-page

3) https://g4.globalreporting.org/Pages/default.aspx

4) https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards-download-center/

Note to ASE: With each case study we send out an email requesting a comment on this case study. If you have not received such an email please contact us.

X